The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 3rd April 2020, in the matter of Bhagwat Sharan (Dead Thr.Lrs.) v.Purushottam & Ors. pronounced that a party cannot be permitted to approbate and reprobate at the same time. Where one party knowingly accepts the benefits of a contract or conveyance or an order, it is estopped to deny the […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 3rd April 2020, in the matter of New Delhi Television Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax pronounced that merely the fact that the original assessment is a detailed one, cannot take away the powers of the assessing officer to issue notice under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 1st April 2020, in the matter of Raja @ Ayyappan v. State Of Tamil Nadu pronounced that if for any reason, a joint trial is not held, the confession of a co-accused cannot be held to be admissible in evidence against another accused who would face trial at a later […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 1st April 2020, Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Rohit Prajapati & Ors. pronounced that environment law cannot countenance the notion of an ex post facto clearance. This would be contrary to both the precautionary principle as well as the need for sustainable development. The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that: Section 3(1) […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 19th March 2020, in the matter of Ram Chandra Prasad Singh Sharad Yadav pronounced that in a writ petition under Article 226 subsequent events can be taken note of for varied purposes. The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that: An event or a conduct of a person even though subsequent to […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 17th March 2020, in the matter of Council of Architecture v. Mr Mukesh Goyal & Ors pronounced that Section 37 of the Architects Act does not prohibit individuals not registered under the Architects Act from undertaking the practice of architecture and its cognate activities. Question(s) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 18th March 2020, in the matter of Rajasthan High Court v. Ved Priya & Anr. observed that merely because ACR’s were consistently marked ‘Good’, cannot be a ground to bestow a probationer with a right to continue in service. The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that: Over the decisions taken by […]
