The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 3rd May 2019, in the matter of Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India (FOGSI) v. Union of India and others pronounced that for conducting a prenatal diagnostic test, if a doctor cannot understand the form he is required to fill and the impact of medical findings and its consequences […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 6th May 2019, in the matter of Tejaswini Gaud And Ors. v. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari and Others, pronounced that in determining the question as to who should be given custody of a minor child, the paramount consideration is the `welfare of the child’ and not rights of the parents under […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 17thMay 2019, in the matter of Century Metal Recycling Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and Otherspronounced that from today, it would be mandatory for the assessing officer to record reasons for rejecting the declared transaction value of imported goods before proceeding further. The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 7th May 2019, in the matter of Bhivchandra Shankar More v. Balu Gangaram More and Ors.observed that pursuing remedy under Order IX Rule 13 CPC does not prohibit filing an appeal under Section 96(2) of the CPC if the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC is dismissed. The Hon’ble Supreme […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 7th May 2019, in the matter of Hemareddi (D) Through Lrs. V. Ramachandra Yallappa Hosmaniand Ors. pronounced that a court is not estopped by a permission to prosecute if subsequently it holds that the appeal has abated as a whole by virtue of Order XXII Rule 3 of CPC. The Hon’ble […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 7th May, 2019, in the matter of State Represented By Inspector Of Police Central Bureau Of Investigation v. M. Subrahmanyam pronounced that a procedural lapse cannot be placed at par with what is or may be substantive violation of the law. Substantive justice must always prevail over procedural or technical justice. […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 8th May 2019, in the matter of State Bank of India v. M/S. Jah Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.observed that no lawyer has any right under Section 30 of the Advocates Act to appear before the in-house committee of banks appointed for the purpose of determining whether a borrower is a […]
