Model draft of an “Application u/ O.XIII R.9 of CPC for return of original documents after decision of the case”.
* Please note that this model draft may be used mutatis mutandis *
-Tushar Kaushik
SC: Govt. is not required to comply with Art. 16 when re-employing retirees
SC: Court cannot review sufficiency of evidence in a departmental inquiry
SC: Judges are bound to explain basis on which they arrive at conclusions
SC: Findings cannot be based on materials produced in a sealed cover
SC: HC can interfere if NCLT exercises jurisdiction not vested in it in law
Model draft of an “Application u/s 148 of CPC, for enlargement of time”
SC: Sole arbitrator must not be appointed by person interested in outcome
whether court fee required for the application under order 13 rule 9.
You would only have to affix the necessary stamp(s) as per the your region’s court’s practice. In our region, it is usually to be stamped with a 10 rupee stamp and a welfare fund stamp.